Skip to content
New
Latest News || 27 October 2026: Dr Soumava Mukherjee's invited talk at Queen's University Belfast joined device-level hardware innovation with channel-level control. || 22 October 2026: I received a Certificate of Appreciation for serving as a reviewer for IEEE IMAS 2026. || 15 October 2026: I presented a poster on beam-domain ML fingerprinting for RIS-aided mmWave localisation at the Centre for Wireless Innovation's annual symposium. || 15 October 2026: CWI's annual symposium brought research and industry perspectives on 6G, ISAC, optical wireless, AI, and future networks to Queen's University Belfast. || 14 October 2026: Erik Nordell of Ericsson visited our Keysight Lab for a live RIS-assisted video streaming demonstration.
Knowledge Hubintegrated sensing and communication7. mmWave and Terahertz ISAC Perspective

integrated sensing and communication learning note

7. mmWave and Terahertz ISAC Perspective

Why mmWave and THz frequencies are central to high-resolution ISAC, and what challenges they introduce.

At a glance

  • Wide bands, fine resolutionHundreds of MHz to tens of GHz of bandwidth separate targets centimetres apart.
  • Short waves, big DopplerThe same motion gives a larger Doppler shift at a higher carrier, so slow or tiny movements become visible.
  • Fragile linksPath loss, blockage and absorption grow with frequency, so beams, RIS and tracking must keep links alive.

Why High Frequency Helps Sensing

mmWave and THz systems provide large bandwidth and small wavelength. These properties are useful for sensing:

  • Large bandwidth improves range resolution.
  • Small wavelength improves sensitivity to small movements.
  • Compact arrays provide high angular resolution.
  • Narrow beams reduce some interference.
ΔR=c2B,fD=2vfcc\Delta R = \frac{c}{2B}, \qquad f_D = \frac{2 v f_c}{c}

Wider bandwidth separates targets more finely in range, and a higher carrier turns the same motion into a larger Doppler shift.

References for this section3

Why High Frequency is Difficult

High-frequency links are fragile:

  • Blockage is severe.
  • Penetration through walls is poor.
  • Beam alignment is critical.
  • Hardware impairments are more significant.
  • Phase noise and synchronization matter.

ISAC must therefore combine high-resolution sensing with robust communication control.

Moving up in frequency: what improves and what gets worse

1. Formula and symbols
ΔR=c/(2B),Δv=λ/(2Tobs)\Delta R=c/(2B),\quad\Delta v=\lambda/(2T_{\rm obs})
θbeam≈2/N,LFS=20log⁡10(4πd/λ)\theta_{\rm beam}\approx2/N,\quad L_{\rm FS}=20\log_{10}(4\pi d/\lambda)
  • BB: bandwidth
  • λ\lambda: wavelength
  • TobsT_{\rm obs}: observation time
  • NN: elements across the aperture
  • dd: path range

Beamwidth is in radians and assumes the stated half-wavelength array model.

Range resolution (smaller is better)3.5 GHz1.50 m28 GHz37.5 cm140 GHz3.7 cm300 GHz1.5 cmSpeed resolution (smaller is better)3.5 GHz4.28 m/s28 GHz0.54 m/s140 GHz0.11 m/s300 GHz0.050 m/sBeamwidth, 10 cm panel (smaller is better)3.5 GHz57.3°28 GHz6.4°140 GHz1.2°300 GHz0.6°Free-space loss at 20 m (smaller is better)3.5 GHz69 dB28 GHz87 dB140 GHz101 dB300 GHz108 dB
2. Work with the current inputs
ΔR=c2B,Δv=λ2Tobs,θbeam≈2N=2D/(λ/2),FSPL=20log⁡104πdλ\Delta R = \frac{c}{2B}, \qquad \Delta v = \frac{\lambda}{2T_{\text{obs}}}, \qquad \theta_{\text{beam}} \approx \frac{2}{N} = \frac{2}{D/(\lambda/2)}, \qquad \mathrm{FSPL} = 20\log_{10}\frac{4\pi d}{\lambda}
3. Result
3.5 GHz1.50 m2 el./side, Doppler 23 Hz per m/s
28 GHz37.5 cm18 el./side, Doppler 187 Hz per m/s
140 GHz3.7 cm93 el./side, Doppler 934 Hz per m/s
300 GHz1.5 cm200 el./side, Doppler 2001 Hz per m/s
Four bands with typical sensing bandwidths. Higher carriers bring wider bandwidth (finer range), shorter wavelength (finer speed for the same observation time) and more elements in the same panel (narrower beams), but every metre costs more free-space loss. Molecular absorption, which adds further loss in parts of the sub-THz and THz range, is not included here.
References for this section3

mmWave ISAC

mmWave is a practical near-term ISAC band because 5G/6G systems already use mmWave-style beamforming. The same arrays used for directional communication can support radar-like sensing.

Use cases:

  • Vehicle tracking.
  • Indoor positioning.
  • Gesture recognition.
  • Beam prediction.
  • Factory monitoring.
References for this section3

THz ISAC

THz frequencies can offer even larger bandwidth and finer sensing resolution. They are promising for extremely high data rates and high-resolution imaging-like sensing.

Challenges:

  • Very high path loss.
  • Molecular absorption.
  • Hardware limitations.
  • Short-range deployment.
  • Severe blockage.
References for this section3

Role of RIS

RIS becomes especially important at mmWave/THz because blockage is the central weakness. A RIS can provide an alternate path and can help illuminate targets that are not visible through the direct path.

References for this section3

Takeaway

mmWave and THz frequencies are natural for ISAC because they provide high-resolution sensing and high-rate communication. Their weakness is fragility, which makes beam management, RIS assistance, and robust tracking essential.

References for this section3

Check your understanding

0 of 4 answered

  1. Range resolution with 4 GHz of bandwidth is about:

  2. A hand moves at 0.5 m/s. How does its Doppler shift at 140 GHz compare with 28 GHz?

  3. Why does RIS matter more at mmWave and THz?

  4. What limits THz ISAC most?

Complete references and further reading